BROOKLYN, NY— Tonight, as
reported last week in Crain’s, Bruce Ratner’s New Jersey Nets will
“debut a prototype of their Frank Gehry-designed, $300,000-a-year Barclays
Center corporate suites at a splashy party in their New York Times Building
showroom.”
Meanwhile, back in reality, Bruce Ratner’s Atlantic Yards development proposal—including the arena for which Barclays Bank has purchased naming rights for $400 million—is on the precipice of failure and currently cannot be built.
“Bruce Ratner once promised ‘affordable’ housing. Now, all he is promising
are luxury arena skyboxes,
and he’s in no position to build even those,” said Develop Don’t Destroy
Brooklyn spokesman Daniel Goldstein. “Tonight’s luxury skybox party vividly
represents the Atlantic Yards bait and switch. The proposed ‘affordable’
housing was the bait to enlist the support of many elected officials backing
the project, as well as ACORN; the switch is that those in need of an
affordable home are left hanging while the ridiculously expensive luxury
skyboxes will be given full priority over everything else Ratner once
promised.”
Developer Forest City Ratner (FCR) does not own all of the properties
it needs to build its proposed arena. Some of that property is in the
hands of other private owners or tenants. New York State’s intention to
seize those properties by eminent domain, and hand them over to Forest
City, is currently being challenged in the courts. Back on March 31, 11
property owners and
tenants filed a petition to the US Supreme Court in their case alleging
that New York State’s use of eminent domain violates the US Constitution.
If the Court takes their case, it would be heard by the end of the year,
and a decision would be rendered roughly one year from now. If the Court
does not take their case, the plaintiffs intend to file their challenge
to eminent domain in New York State court.
In addition to this ownership problem, Forest City Ratner’s Atlantic Yards proposal faces other substantial obstacles, including:
FCR needs at least $1.4 billion in tax-free housing bonds, but they are not available.
FCR does not have the bond it needs for its $950 million arena—more than double the price tag of the most expensive arena every built.
The credit market is in crisis.
Construction costs have increased astronomically, and continue to rise.
New York City’s real estate boom is over, and Brooklyn has a large oversupply of condos.
Political opinion has substantially shifted against the project. (See: May 3rd protest rally)
-
A coming appeal of the community
lawsuit challenging the project’s environmental review and overall
approval.
-
Other outstanding
litigation and the possibility of new litigation beyond that.