 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
tel/fax:
718.362.4784
Please note our new postal address when sending
contributions to the legal fund:
121 5th Avenue, PMB #150
Brooklyn, New York 11217
About DDDB
Our coalition consists of 21 community organizations and
there are 51 community organizations formally
aligned in opposition to the Ratner plan.
DDDB is a volunteer-run organization. We have over 5,000
subscribers to our email newsletter, and 7,000 petition
signers. Over 800 volunteers have registered with DDDB
to form our various teams, task-forces and committees
and we have over 150 block captains. We have a 20 person
volunteer legal team of local lawyers supplementing our
retained attorneys.
We are funded entirely by individual donations from the community at large
and through various fundraising events we and supporters have organized.
We have the financial support of well over 3,500 individual
donors.
More about
DDDB...
|
|
|
|
 |
ARCHIVES:
By Date|
By Category|
Text Search
|
Feds Grant $55 Million to Forest City Ratner. Funds Seem to be for Atlantic Yards
The Federal Government has just given $55 million to "Forest City Community Development
Entity, LLC" headquartered in Brooklyn. It is not clear if it is a $55
million "tax credit" or if it is a straight out grant. We're attempting
to find out. It appears to be a $55 million "tax credit."
It is also not clear if all the money is for Atlantic Yards, but one would
assume most of it is since Atlantic Yards is the only supposedly vertical construction
project the parent company Forest City Enterprises is undertaking (according to
them). We're attempting to find out. Norman
Oder is reporting that the ESDC has confirmed that these tax credits ALL go
to Atlantic Yards.
Click
this and search "Forest City" (page 13) in the pdf you
download. And to see what Forest City plans to do with it, a little more specifically,
click this and see page 72.
The money comes from the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund. Here
is an overview of what
that Fund does:
Through monetary awards and the allocation of tax credits, the CDFI
Fund helps promote access to capital and local economic growth in urban and
rural low-income communities across the nation.
Through its various programs, the CDFI Fund enables locally based organizations
to further goals such as: economic development (job creation, business development,
and commercial real estate development); affordable housing (housing development
and homeownership); and community development financial services (provision
of basic banking services to underserved communities and financial literacy
training).
Funny, but it doesn't mention the most expensive arena in the history of humankind.
The press release from
the Fund, quoting Secretary Geithner.
We think this appropriation would violate federal law governing federal funds
for economic development project's that use eminent domain. That law punishes
governments that violate the law by denying the whole state federal
money for economic development projects for two years. (We are checking the current
status of this bill...)
Update: We think this bill from 2005 has been reauthorized and
applies.We'll continue looking....
This is the language of the amendment, as was passed in 2005 and 2006:
No funds in this Act may be used to support any Federal, State, or local projects
that seek to use the power of eminent domain, unless eminent domain is employed
only for a public use: Provided, That for purposes of this section, public use
shall not be construed to include economic development that primarily benefits
private entities: Provided further, That any use of funds for mass transit, railroad,
airport, seaport or highway projects as well as utility projects which benefit
or serve the general public (including energy-related, communication-related,
water-related and wastewater-related infrastructure), other structures designated
for use by the general public or which have other common-carrier or public-utility
functions that serve the general public and are subject to regulation and oversight
by the government, and projects for the removal of an immediate threat to public
health and safety or brownsfield as defined in the Small Business Liability Relief
and Brownsfield Revitalization Act (Public Law 107–118) shall be considered
a public use for purposes of eminent domain. More by way of explanation and some clarity from Norman Oder on his Atlantic Yards Report.
Posted: 10.30.09
|
|
 |
 |